Boeing’s 737 Max issues highlighted the company’s sacrifice of safety for financial performance, resulting in a tarnished reputation. The prioritization of profit over core values also damaged the FAA’s credibility and revealed a lack of accountability for top executives. This downfall serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining core values and prioritizing them over short-term financial gains.
Having represented many clients with selling their businesses, raising capital, or entering into joint ventures, the issue of Non-Disclosure Agreements (“NDA”) always arises. The primary focus of clients is on ensuring that the NDA is as secure as possible and often such that no reasonable party would agree to it. Thus, I find my job is to help them understand what is commercially reasonable, and more importantly, to work with them to understand who is the other party executing the NDA.
Most sales of small companies these days in the US are to Private Equity Groups, and so many people become complacent about understanding who the other party is. If the other party is not someone that is known, far more work needs to be done to understand:
Who is the other party is;
Where are they located;
What you each have; and
How much you share.
Failure to do this potentially exposes you to the “Achilles Heel” of the NDA.
First of all, if there is a breach of the NDA, most NDAs allow for injunctive relief, which is obtainable in the US, so damage within the US may be limited. However, if you want more than injunctive relief in the US, the areas of concerns are:
Who is the company? A Fortune 500 Company, some sizeable foreign company that you have never heard of, but there is information on or some company that for which there is no information? Many people don’t look at who is executing the agreement if they believe the person they are dealing with is with XYZ Corporation that they know.
However, if the entity executing the NDA is a single purpose subsidiary of XYZ, does it have any capital? Is XYZ a party to the transaction? Finally, there are cases in some developing markets, especially China, where government entities own many companies, i.e., the People’s Liberation Army owns many Chinese businesses, and thus for all practical purposes, these are immune from any claims.
Recently I came across a situation where ABC, a US company, found that their confidential information was being used against them by Z, a subsidiary of Company Y in China. ABC had executed an NDA with X, a Singaporean special purpose subsidiary of Y with no assets. Also, there was a Letter of Intent with T, a US subsidiary of Y, which also had no assets. As a result, there were no identifiable assets to go against, and to win in China would be hard.
If the NDA is with a non-US company, you may have issues in bringing a claim. While the NDA may provide that the venue and choice of law are your home state, the other party has to be served and appeared in federal or that state’s court. If the other party is not in the US, it may be challenging to serve even them because they may not exist, or the address/agent provided doesn’t exist. If you can’t serve them, a proceeding may be complicated.
Assuming you serve them, and they fail to appear, you should win in court. However, even if you do, you may not be able to enforce any claims because their courts will not recognize the US court’s decision. In some countries I have dealt with, judges have not recognized contractual agreements because “times have changed.” Not all countries have a judicial system like ours with precedent and some predictability.
Even if governmental agencies don’t own these companies, in some countries, if well-connected business people and politicians do, that may have the same result. Bringing any claims against a company owned by such a businessman or politician may result in you, your company, or employees being harassed or imprisoned on some charge in these countries, i.e., China and Russia.
How Much Has Each Party?
1. What Assets do They Have?
If it is a single purpose entity with no assets, even if you bring the claim and win, there are no assets to pay monetary damages. Injunctive relief is all you have. That may not fix any damage done to your brand or pay for all the litigation. Even if they have assets, if there are superior claims on those assets, i.e., bank liens, that can rank above your claim, you could win but still receive no monetary damages.
Finally, if they are a large company with deep pockets, they may fight you in court with a full army of in-house and third-party lawyers. Besides, even if they lose, they may be willing to fight through many appeals. The purpose is to wear down a smaller company just by having more resources.
2. What Assets do You Have?
While many client’s businesses are profitable and have value, the company may not have the financial wherewithal to fund litigation, especially international litigation. To fight a company in the US that is determined to protect its image on an NDA could cost $0.5MM and more. Many small companies don’t have that amount of excess cash to put towards litigation. Besides, not only is there the cost of the lawsuit but the disruption to the business. Discovery, depositions, etc. can absorb large amounts of time and resources from a small company causing it to lose its way or position and thus value.
3. What Loss have You Experienced?
Raising this issue causes an angry response from many clients? The value of the business, which they may think, is very high, has now suffered a loss in value. As with all litigation, you must demonstrate the damage. If there is a $XMM offer from a buyer who immediately reduces the offer to $YMM quickly on finding out about the breach, then the loss is $(X – Y)MM. However, in all other situations proving the quantum of the damage is much more complicated. Experts are required to determine your loss, which also increases the costs of litigation. The other side will also have their experts to prove no loss in value and show where your experts are wrong. Finally, the winner and amount of the win are never guaranteed when walking into a court, no matter what you think.
How Much Information Do You Share
While you are going to discuss your business, the products, customers, and opportunities, I think it is advisable to be economical with some of that information. Give the other party enough for them to make a decision and be interested. However, many owners are so proud and excited about their business, with good reason; they cannot help themselves from disclosing how they do everything. While some of this information may be a trade secret, it may not have been protected as such or may be more difficult to claim such in litigation. If the other party knows how you do everything, they may decide they can duplicate your business using your processes but not using your technology or approaching your customers. They do this; it may be much hard to identify and protect.
Thus, be careful with your NDAs by knowing:
Who you are dealing with;
Where are they located;
What they have;
Know what you can do if they breach; and
Let your advisor help you control the information flow.
© 2015 Marc Borrelli All Rights Reserved
In reflecting on 2021 resolutions, the author scored themselves in three categories and sought to improve success in 2022 by addressing friction points. Drawing on advice from social psychologist Wendy Wood, the author identified areas to reduce or increase friction in their failed resolutions. By making these adjustments, the author aims to enhance their goal achievement and encourages others to consider friction when setting resolutions.
COVID has taken a toll on all of us. If you have not taken an extended vacation in a while where you disconnect, you need to now. You and your business will benefit.
In a previous discussion, I highlighted the importance of being famous for something. Being well-known in your niche can help you: Concentrate on your strengths Connect with your target audience Communicate your offerings more effectively Receive referrals Identify...
Understanding and optimizing the Cash Conversion Cycle is crucial for business growth, as it impacts cash flow and the ability to access external capital. This cycle consists of four components: Sales, Make/Production & Inventory, Delivery, and Billing and Payments. To improve the Cash Conversion Cycle, companies can eliminate mistakes, shorten cycle times, and revamp their business models.
As an entrepreneur, it’s crucial to specialize in a specific area and become famous for something, allowing you to generate referrals and build your brand. Understanding the “job” you’re hired for helps you stand out in the marketplace and communicate your value proposition effectively. By providing value to your clients, you can adopt a value-based pricing approach, ensuring your business remains competitive and maintains a strong market presence.
Rethink your pricing model by focusing on the value you provide and your customers’ Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA). This approach can help you maximize margins while delivering better value to your clients. Assess your offerings and brainstorm with your team to identify pricing adjustment opportunities or eliminate commodity products or services.
I recently facilitated a workshop with several CEOs where we worked on the dramatic business growth model components. One of the questions that I had asked them beforehand was, "What is Your Profit/X?" The results showed that there this concept is not clear to many....
In today’s War for Talent, attracting the best employees requires a focus on value creation, core customer, brand promise, and value delivery. Clearly articulate your company’s mission, identify your “core employee” based on shared values, and offer more than just a salary to stand out as an employer. Utilize employee satisfaction metrics and showcase your company’s commitment to its workforce on your website to make a strong impression on potential candidates.
Productivity remained during WFH with COVID. However, further analysis found that hourly productivity fell and was compensated for by employees working more hours. What was the culprit – Meetings. Want to increase productivity, have fewer meetings.