Every Business Needs a Good Prenuptial Agreement

Every Business Needs a Good Prenuptial Agreement

Over the last few years, I have come across several situations where one of the business owners wants to sell their share of the business, and there is no Buy-Sell Agreement to resolve the situation.

Often the owners disagree on the future direction of the business, and their relationship is now hurting the business. Companies are about people, so it should not be surprising that business relationships like all relationships end. While the company may make money, if you no longer enjoy the working environment, you will want out regardless. So like marriages, if you have a Buy-Sell on how to deal with a split, like a prenuptial agreement, it will save a lot of pain later on.

Of all the situations, I have run into the saddest one involved Peter*. About ten years ago, based on his professional work, Peter had come up with an idea for a web-based business. Like many entrepreneurs, he didn’t have much money, so he offered his programmer, John, a percentage of the equity as payment for work done. Peter’s wife, Susan, also got involved in the business as the “CFO” to handle the finances. The company grew with Peter directing sales and product concepts, John programming and Susan ensuring they were financially solvent. By the time I met Peter, the business was doing over $1MM a year in revenue and growing at about 20% p.a. Peter and Susan were putting everything the company generated back into it to drive growth. Thus, they had no liquid assets. Peter had just returned from a sales trip to the West Coast and on arriving back in Atlanta was informed by Susan that she had:

  • filed for divorce;

  • changed the locks to their home where the business operated, and he was no longer welcome;

  • agreed with John to terminate his employment effective immediately and would pay him severance not yet determined; and

  • agreed with John that Peter’s interest in the business would be part of the divorce settlement.

Peter’s fundamental issues were as follows:

  • No Way Out;

  • Valuation;

  • Funding Mechanism;

  • Operating Agreement;

  • Record Keeping; and

  • Non-Competes.

Unfortunately, Peter is not alone in facing these issues, and many business owners I have dealt with have met them or could face similar problems in a similar situation.

 

No Way Out

In all of these situations, there was no Buy-Sell Agreement, and the Operating or Shareholders’ agreement was a simple document comprising one to four pages. Owners use these documents because: (i) no one wants to spend scarce resources on legal documents in the beginning; (ii) the owners don’t understand the materials, which they have often download them from the internet; (iii) they are committed to the dream and no one thinks of the breakup and its consequences; and (iv) if there was a Buy-Sell it only related to death and was funded by life insurance.

Unable to exit and stuck in the business, growing animosity between the owners’reflected their frustration, which destroys morale and the value of the company. The result is often litigation, which results in more business value destruction or even worse liquidation.

Peter didn’t have a buy-sell agreement; therefore, he had no way of forcing Susan and John to buy him out or buy them out. So for about two years, he was in limbo, an owner with no rights, no distributions, no income, and no cash.

Buy-Sell Agreements need to have a way for an owner to exit by dealing with:

  • When can it be activated – When can it be initiated: Death, disability, retirement, divorce, disagreement, deadlock.

  • Type of Agreement – Should it be a redemption agreement or a cross-purchase agreement? Should the Seller be required to sell and the buyer required to buy, or do, they have options to buy or sell, or some variation thereof. Can third parties purchase? If so, is there a right of first refusal?

  • The process – what is the timing for each step. Do the other shareholders have to agree to a third-party buyer? What does is required of the third party?

  • Valuation – How is the company valued, and who pays for determining the value?

  • Covenants not to Compete – If so, how long, how broad, and are there geographic limitations.

Finally, if the Buy-Sell allows for sales to third parties, it will only be attractive to third-party investors if: the Operating Agreements allows for good Corporate Governance; there are Financial Reviews; access to the books; and removal of management for non-performance, etc. No third party is going to invest in a business where they no rights and controls. Again few startup businesses have these provisions in place.

 

Valuation

The first issue with any separation is how to split the assets. In this case, it is what is the value of the business. At the time of the company, divorce emotions are so high, that agreeing is difficult. It is much better to build in a mechanism at the beginning when there are no emotions, which define the business valuation methodology and who, if needed, will pay for it. Many Buy-Sells use fixed value or fixed method. However, given that situations change over time, none of these methods is foolproof. Often the best solution is to have a fixed price valuation that is updated annually in the Buy-Sell Agreement. Of course, this requires remembering to get an appraisal done every year.

Because Peter had no Buy-Sell agreement, there was no mechanism for agreeing on how to value the business. A year after terminating him, Susan and John had a valuation done, paid for by the company, that, according to Peter, undervalued the business. Peter argued that if they thought the company was worth so little, he would buy Susan and John out at that price. They refused and said that was all they would offer. Peter’s only recourse was litigation.

Another situation I have come across is “Death by Valuation.” A recent case involved two owners deadlocked over the business. Owner #1 wanted to buy out his partners, Owner #2, and made a low ball offer. Owner #2 had a valuation done by a professional valuation company. Owner #1 didn’t like the result and had his appraisal done by another company. Owner #2 didn’t like that value, and as a result, was headed to hire a third valuation company to do a valuation. As far as I could see, they were engaged in obtaining a never-ending series of estimates until they ran out of money or energy. I persuaded them to agree to negotiate a value based on the two existing valuations.

 

Funding Mechanism

Once a price is agreed – the next key issue is Money! How is a buyout going to be funded? Many owners I have met tell me that this is not an issue since they have Buy-Sell agreements financed by insurance. Unfortunately, the insurance is usually life or disability insurance, and so there is a shocked look from all parties when I ask who is willing to die for the team. Another problem with insurance backed Buy-Sell agreements is improper ownership and beneficiary designations. Finally, there could be additional tax issues that arise from such insurance policies.

Someone has to come up with the money! Of course, the Golden Rule still applies, “He has the gold makes the rules” – or gets the better deal. Many owners shocked at the value of the business – especially if it is in an early growth stage where it is absorbing capital, and so they see little in the way of distributions, but huge value. There are many ways of raising money from SBA Loans, Bank Loans, ESOPs, Partial Recaps, third party investors, etc. However, all of these will still require:

  • The business that is attractive to third-party buyers and lenders;

  • A good team well runs the business;

  • The owners have good credit scores and are not already too leveraged; and

  • There is a plan for future growth.

Remember, “Plan to keep your business for generations, but run it as though you were going to sell it tomorrow.”

In Peter’s case, there was no funding mechanism, and John and Susan were unprepared to obtain their party financing to pay Peter out immediately. They offered to pay him out over five years, depending on the company’s cash flow. However, he had the key sales relationships in the business and had developed the product based on his professional experience. John and Susan had no connections with the leading clients or knowledge of what the industry required. Within three years, the business was half its size, and Peter never received 50% of his buyout.

 

Operating Agreement

The Operating Agreement or Shareholders Agreement of the company needs to cover several areas, but among those should be Company Distributions and IP Protection.

Company Distributions

While this is not part of Buy-Sell, it is worth determining as part of the operating agreement. How much will the business be required to distribute to the owners each year? Many times this is not clear, or the majority vote determines it. If the Buy-Sell doesn’t’ take into account retirement, the distributions from the company may be the only income of an owner. Thus others could potentially squeeze out an owner by making no distributions to owners but paying out excess cash in bonuses. If the company is a pass-through for tax purposes, this can put financial pressure on an owner, as they have to pay taxes on their share of the income but no cash to do so.

In Peter’s case, it was not clear, so John and Susan stopped all company distributions as they claimed that the company needs funds for litigation and to pay massive bonuses. Peter, who was still fighting over his divorce, received no distributions and had an IRS bill for 35% of the company’s profits for two years. As a result, he had little funds and could not afford the only option available – litigation. 

IP Ownership.

Often in such cases, there is an issue over the IP. In some situations, the owner developed the IP, had it registered in their name, and never transferred the rights to the company. The IP needs to be the property of the company! Who has what rights in the company, and to the IP if there is a breakup determined elsewhere.

I know of a startup that was seeking to raise $2MM to fund the next stage of its development. It has already raised money from friends and family, had developed its technology, and had some clients and revenue. As we were about to approach investors, one of the owners claimed he was owed $300k for developing IP for the company. The other owners disagreed, and the result was that the owner with IP left, and the company collapsed.

 

Record-Keeping

In many cases, I found that the owners tell me that while they don’t have specific Buy-Sell agreements, they have other contracts that solve these issues. However, when I look at these other agreements, it often turns out that often they are inappropriately executed if executed at all, or they don’t solve the problem. It is hard when running a startup that is growing to document all that is agreed; however, not doing so can be your undoing.

In Peter’s case, he had drafted an agreement that said that in return for the shares granted to Susan and John, all of them had their positions in the company protected. However, they never executed it. While Peter was convinced the board agreed to it at a board meeting, there were no board minutes to corroborate the fact.

In another case, I dealt with years ago an owner had bought out his partner for $20k. Now ten years later, he was looking to sell the business for over $20MM. However, he couldn’t find any of the documentation relating to the share purchase. Luckily he was able to get his old partner to execute new documents without any changes to the deal, but that may not have been the case.

 

Non-Competes

Many owners will seek to have the exiting shareholder sign a non-compete for some period. While this is understandable, it is best to do it when setting up the company, and it is emotional. It should define: what is covered, where it is protected, and how long it should run. The difficulty often arises when two people start a business together and develop it for several years before the divorce. At that point, they are known and have a reputation in the industry. The non-compete may prevent them from working in that industry and thus forcing them to start a new career. Therefore, these have to be thought through carefully as things could be very different in 10 years when the breakup occurs.

In Peter’s case, he had come up with the idea based on his professional work. Neither John nor Susan had any experience in the industry. However, when they drafted the non-compete, they excluded him from any activity in the industry where he had worked before starting the company.

* Names were changed, and Peter was not a client but someone I tried to help and who became a friend.

 

© 2015 Marc Borrelli All Rights Reserved

Recent Posts

5 Strategic Leadership Skills Every Manager Needs

5 Strategic Leadership Skills Every Manager Needs

So often, people view leadership as a talent: you’re either born with this quality or you’re not. However, this is not always the case! In reality, good leadership is made up of skills, and anyone can learn how to improve. Some people may pick up leadership attributes...

5 Ways to Use Email Automation to Boost Traffic

5 Ways to Use Email Automation to Boost Traffic

Every single business in the world wants to evolve and grow. This will happen using a variety of techniques and strategies. In 2022, digital marketing is more than a household name, and most companies will adopt at least a few ideas when long-term planning and coming...

Profit and Revenue are Lousy Core Values

Profit and Revenue are Lousy Core Values

As I mentioned last week, I am down with COVID and tired, so spending more time reading rather than working. I read Bill Browder's Freezing Order this weekend, and I highly recommend it. However, at the end of the book, Browder says that oligarchs, autocrats, and...

Want to Grow Your Business: Consider a Board of Advisors

Want to Grow Your Business: Consider a Board of Advisors

Many privately owned businesses don’t have Boards of Directors since they don’t have outside shareholders there is no need to. However, having a Board of Advisors has been shown to result in a 3x greater growth in sales and profits than companies without them.

 

What is a Board of Advisors?

A Board of Advisors comprises 3 to four high-level executives who provide the CEO with advice and are focused on the CEO’s success. However, unlike a Board of Directors, the CEO doesn’t have to take their advice. Their role is to:

  • Hold him and the management team accountable. We all believe we can hold ourselves accountable but fail miserably;
  • Act as a coach;
  • As the difficult questions or the questions no one is asking;
  • Enable the CEO to focus ON the business and not IN the business – to stop the tyranny of urgency taking precedence over the important;
  • Validate the CEO’s ideas and strategy; and
  • Bring their experience to the company.

Many CEOs are dealing with their business their business issues and fighting fires. As a result, they don’t get a chance to focus on the business and discuss ideas and strategies with people who have a lot of experience and can guide them. There is that old saying, “You don’t know what you don’t know” and a Board of Advisors can help the CEO navigate through such areas.

What is a Board of Advisors not! It is not a group of people to make introductions to potential sales targets.

 

Who should be on the Board?

The Board of Advisors is there to help you and should not have other interests, so it should not include advisors or consultants that you already use, i.e. your accountant or lawyer. Also, it is not necessary to get a marquee name that has retired. More useful is to get middle to upper management that has real experience with the issues the CEO is facing and from a range of industries. That way he can get the benefit of best practices across all industries and learn of new solutions to problems in the industry. As times change and the company faces new issues, the board should change to have a membership with experience with such issues.

Like a marriage, you need the right partners. These are people the CEO can rely on to provide good advice and like your doctor will see you “naked”. Ideally a group with different skill sets that complement the CEO’s skills and deal with issues currently facing the company.

 

How should they be compensated?

People often joke that Board of Advisors is just paid coffee, water and a bagel. Typically they don’t work for much; however, it is advisable to pay them a stipend, i.e. $20k, even if it is a contribution to a charity in their name. Why? Because you are asking them of their time and commitment, and if compensated, they are more likely to return that urgent call when you have a crisis. Also they should all be paid the same.

Sometimes they also get equity; however, since many of the companies seeking a Board of Advisors are private, the company doesn’t want to give equity. However, synthetic equity works such instances. In addition, if you have a Board of Advisors and are raising equity capital, all the Board members need to have purchased equity in the business, as most Angel and Venture Capitalists will not see it as positive the Board of Advisors is not willing to invest.

 

How often should the Board of Advisors meet?

Typically, they should meet between four and six times a year. Not less than four, and if over four maybe the additional meetings should be telephonic. The meetings are often 4 hours as well as some preparation time of maybe 10 hours, so if you are asking for six meetings per year, you are asking for a commitment of 84 hours a year or two weeks.

 

When do you need them?

A small company can always use the independent outside input; however, they are especially useful when going through inflection points in the company’s life, or the marketplace is changing dramatically. When dealing with something the company has not faced before, the Board of Advisors can be invaluable to the CEO as he navigates a new course. If you realize you need one it is often too late. However, most important is that the CEO must believe that they will be beneficial, and the CEO must be coachable. If not there is no point!

 

Who should attend?

The senior management I believe to be best. However, not necessarily all at once! They can each attend as their area is discussed and reviewed. As a result, they are receiving coaching too, and the benefit of the Board’s expertise as strategies are proposed and discussed. However, there should be just a time for the CEO as there are only things that can be discussed with the CEO, i.e. the perceived performance of a senior manager or the CEO’s failure to live up to his deliverables.

 

Should there be agreements with them?

While they are not a Board of Directors, you should have agreements with them. These agreements need to set out, among other things:

  • Pay – They know what they are getting.
  • Time Commitment – They know what they are committing to.
  • Liability – They know what to expect.
  • Term – They can let them go when the company needs different skills with no difficulty
  • Nondisclosure terms and non-competes as relevant – protects all parties.

Recent Posts

5 Strategic Leadership Skills Every Manager Needs

5 Strategic Leadership Skills Every Manager Needs

So often, people view leadership as a talent: you’re either born with this quality or you’re not. However, this is not always the case! In reality, good leadership is made up of skills, and anyone can learn how to improve. Some people may pick up leadership attributes...

5 Ways to Use Email Automation to Boost Traffic

5 Ways to Use Email Automation to Boost Traffic

Every single business in the world wants to evolve and grow. This will happen using a variety of techniques and strategies. In 2022, digital marketing is more than a household name, and most companies will adopt at least a few ideas when long-term planning and coming...

Profit and Revenue are Lousy Core Values

Profit and Revenue are Lousy Core Values

As I mentioned last week, I am down with COVID and tired, so spending more time reading rather than working. I read Bill Browder's Freezing Order this weekend, and I highly recommend it. However, at the end of the book, Browder says that oligarchs, autocrats, and...