“Why don’t they use common sense?!” You may have said this phrase yourself, or heard it with your managers, when discussing an employee’s actions. However, the frustrated appeal to “common sense” doesn’t actually make any meaningful change in your organization. We all make decisions based on the information we have and the guides we have to use. So if the wrong decisions are being made in your organization, it’s time to examine the tools you give decision-makers.
I recently saw an article saying, “Reverse Mergers are more Popular than Ever.” The author was extolling the virtues of such transactions for MicroCap Stocks. However, this solution I rarely find delivers as promised, in many cases, is more of a poison chalice.
How it works
A private entity reverses into a public shell company to go public. The shareholders in the private corporation exchange their shares for the public company’s shares. The number of shares issued to the private company gives its shareholders control over a majority of the stock of the shell, and so they are running the public company.
The legal structure for this type of merger is called a “reverse triangular merger.” The process of a reverse triangular merger is:
- The public shell company creates a subsidiary entity.
- The newly formed subsidiary merges into the private company that is buying the shell.
- The newly formed subsidiary has now disappeared, so the private company becomes a subsidiary of the shell company.
Using a reverse triangular merger avoids the shareholder approval process usually required for acquisitions. The deal requires shareholder approval – the shareholders of the private company and shareholder of the new subsidiary entity. However, the only shareholder of the new subsidiary is its parent company.
The process is beneficial because there is no change in control of the private company, and the private company continues to operate as a going concern; thus, preventing any potential damage to the business from loss of contracts if either of those events were to occur.
However, a reverse merger still requires the filing of a Form 8-K with the SEC, which requires much of same the information found in an initial public offering prospectus.
The Case for Reversing into a Public Shell
The of advantages with a reverse merger are:
Speed. A reverse merger takes just a few months.
Time commitment. A reverse merger requires far less effort than an initial public offering, allowing the management team to continue to focus on the business.
Timing. As this is a discussion about Micro Caps, raising cash is not a likely scenario, so that a reverse merger can take place regardless of stock market conditions.
Tradable currency. As a public company, it is easier for a corporation to use its stock for acquisitions. Also, the value of its stock is theoretically more certain and realizes a higher multiple, increasing the company’s value.
Liquidity. Sometimes the existing shareholders of a private company favor the reverse merger path to have an exit for selling their shares. Especially in cases where the shareholders are unable to sell their shares to the company or other shareholders, and the majority of shareholders don’t want to sell the company.
Stock options. As a public company, stock options are more valuable to recipients and so can be used to incentivize management and employees. If the option holders elect to exercise their options, they can then sell the shares to the general public rather than having the company have to buy them.
The Problems of Reversing into a Public Shell
The disadvantages are:
Cash. Since we are discussing Micro Caps, an IPO is not a possibility. Thus, the company will not be able to raise money through the reverse.
Cost and Loss of Value. While the reverse merger typically is cheaper than an IPO, there is still considerable ongoing expenditure to meet the requirements of being public. An active business can expect to at least $500,000 a year on auditors, attorneys, SOX compliance, filing fees, investor relations, etc. which are required by being public. Also, assuming the company is trading on an 8x multiple and has a tax rate of 35%, this will reduce the value of the company by $1.8MM
Prior life. Following the Great Recession, there is currently a glut of failed dot-com shells on the US and Canadian Shell markets. Unless the Buyer is very familiar with the Principals and previous business involved, bear in mind the words from Lost in Space – “Danger, Will Robinson!” Without spending a small fortune and investing vast amounts of time, it is almost impossible to find all their contracts and obligations, as well as the legal actions, launched them. As such, there will always be questions about what you are buying. Also, many of these companies have a terrible will with existing stockholders, and a bad reputation is hard to shake.
Liabilities. Not all shell companies are actual shells. In additional to unresolved litigation and disgruntled shareholders, as mentioned above, many have undisclosed financial obligations and regulatory history that will not go away after the reverse merger. Sellers of shell companies often are economical with the truth, the problems, or potential problems with the company. On completion of the transaction, the sellers have little incentive to solve these issues, leaving litigation as the only remedy, and an imperfect solution it is. Acquiring only a shell that has been inactive for several years can ameliorate this risk.
Stock price. When a company does a reverse merger, many of the existing shareholders seek to exit. However, all these selling shareholders put downward pressure on the stock price since there are now more sellers than buyers. A falling stock price reduces the effectiveness of stock options issued to employees and increases the dilution of the existing shareholders if they plan to use the stock for acquisitions.
Thinly traded. Usually, there is only a minimal amount of trading volume in the stock of a public shell company. Immediately following the reverse merger, only the shares held by the original shell shareholders are tradable, as no other shares are registered with the SEC yet. Building trading volume takes time, an active public relations and investor relations campaign, as well as the registration of additional stock. Besides, if the market capitalization of the company is below a certain threshold, no analysts will follow it, and most mutual funds cannot buy it. The lack of analyst coverage and fund demand will reduce interest in the company further.
Finally, thinly trade shares are volatile, and the price will tend to move a great deal on any sizable order. However, any untoward movement in the stock price could lead to class action litigation, and the costs of fighting these lawsuits can be substantial.
As can be seen, there are significant issues with public shell companies that should keep companies from buying them. In particular:
The annual cost of being a public company – which should prevent any micro-cap from considering this path, and
Being a thinly-traded stock – this offsets the main reason for being a public tradable stock.
© 2015 Marc Borrelli All Rights Reserved
You can only determine profitability when you know your costs. I’ve discussed before that you should price according to value, not hours. However, you still need to know your costs to understand the minimum pricing and how it is performing. Do you consider each jobs’ profitability when you price new jobs? Do you know what you should be charging to ensure you hit your profit targets? These discussions about a company’s profitability, and what measure drives profit, are critical for your organization.
If you were starting your business today, what would you do differently? This thought-provoking question is a valuable exercise, especially when it brings up the idea of “sunk costs” and how they limit us. A sunk cost is a payment or investment that has already been made. Since it is unrecoverable no matter what, a sunk cost shouldn’t be factored into any future decisions. However, we’re all familiar with the sunk cost fallacy: behavior driven by a past expenditure that isn’t recoupable, regardless of future actions.
Bringing clarity to your organization is a common theme on The Disruption! blog. Defining your business model is a worthwhile exercise for any leadership team. But how do you even begin to bring clarity into your operations? If you’re looking for a place to start, Josh Kaufman’s “Five Parts of Every Business” offers an excellent framework. Kaufman defines five parts of every business model that all flow into the next, breaking it down into Value Creation, Marketing, Sales, Value Delivery, and Finance.
Bringing in new ideas, thoughts, understanding, and logic is key as your organization faces the challenges of a changing environment. But when you do an ideation session in your organization… how does it go? For so many organizations, many times, after a few ideas have been thrown out and rejected, the thought process slows down very quickly, and a form of hopelessness takes over. How does your organization have better ideation? I’ve come across a new approach with a few teams lately.
An uptick in business has begun this quarter, and companies are rushing to hire to meet this surge in demand. What amazes me is how many are so unprepared to hire. Continual recruiting is key to the survival of a company. It isn’t the same thing as hiring—continuous recruiting is building a pipeline of people that you would hire if you needed to fill a position, or “A players” you would hire if they were available.
If your organization is focused on obscurity over clarity, whether intentionally or not, your “A” player employees are vulnerable. There is a looming talent crunch. As we start to emerge from COVID, demand is increasing, and many are scrambling to fill positions to meet that demand. Headhunters and recruiters are soon going to be calling your key “A” employees. Have you been giving them a reason to stay?
As Leonard Bernstein put it so well, “To achieve great things, two things are needed: a plan and not quite enough time.” Your meetings can be shorter, more fruitful, and engaging, with better outcomes for the organization, employees, and managers. It’s time to examine your meeting rhythms and how you set meeting agendas. This week, I break down daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, annual, and individual meeting rhythms, with sample agendas for each.
Let’s start here: Why should your company be scalable at all? If your business is scalable, you have business freedom–freedom with time, money, and options. Many business leaders get stuck in the “owner’s trap”, where you need to do everything yourself. Sound familiar? If you want a scalable business that gives you freedom, you need to be intentional about what you sell, and how.
Companies are gearing up to hire. Unfortunately, many are competing within the same talent pool. Some experts are currently predicting a strong economic recovery starting in May or June. But as the economy booms, there is going to be fierce competition for talent. How will you fare in the looming talent crisis? Your organization should be creating a plan, now, so you can attract the talent you need in the year ahead.